Our Blog

A business owner wins a judgment worth millions of naira, celebrates for a week, then watches the debtor ignore every letter, phone call and polite reminder that follows. Meanwhile, somewhere across town, another business owner logs into their bank account and finds it frozen without warning, with no idea why their own money is suddenly off-limits. Both situations usually trace back to the same legal tool: the garnishee order.

By the end of this, you will understand what a garnishee order actually does, how it moves from a court application to money in your account (or out of someone else’s), and what options exist if you are the one caught on the wrong end of it.

Prerequisites

• A subsisting money judgment that remains unpaid, not just a court ruling in your favour on liability
• Knowledge of where the judgment debtor banks, or who employs them, since garnishee proceedings target a specific third party holding the debtor’s money
• Patience for a two-stage court process, since no garnishee order is final on the first appearance

Start a garnishee proceeding after obtaining a judgment

Having a judgment in your favour means almost nothing if the debtor refuses to pay. A judgment is a piece of paper. A garnishee order is the thing that turns that paper into cash sitting in your account.

To begin, the judgment creditor files an ex parte motion, meaning the debtor is not in the room when the application is made. The motion must come with a sworn affidavit confirming several specific things: that a valid judgment exists, that the judgment sum remains unsatisfied, the exact unpaid amount, and that a named third party within the court’s jurisdiction owes money to the debtor.

That detail about identifying the exact amount matters more than it sounds. You need a figure, and that figure has to match your judgment, minus anything already recovered. If you’ve been paid part of the debt and you file for the full original sum, you’ve created a problem for yourself before the case even starts.

The choice at this stage is simple but important: you need to know, or have good reason to believe, that a specific bank or employer holds the debtor’s money. Filing blind, hoping the court will figure out where the money is, wastes time and money.

A garnishee order nisi immediately attaches third-party funds

Here’s what catches most people by surprise: an order nisi is not the final word, but it hits like one.

Once the court is satisfied with the ex parte application, it issues the order nisi. This tells the third party, the garnishee, to appear in court on a set date and explain why it should not be ordered to pay the judgment creditor directly. Until that court date, the garnishee legally cannot hand the debtor’s money to anyone.

When the garnishee is a bank, the practical result is a frozen account. The bank must stop disbursement of the attached sum and hold it until the court gives further direction, a mandate Mondaq’s overview of garnishee proceedings confirms applies specifically to the funds covered by the order, not necessarily every account the person or company holds.

This is precisely why business owners sometimes find their accounts locked with no warning. If you’re a judgment debtor, or even a third party whose account shares a name or relationship with one, the freeze lands before you get a chance to argue anything. The order is already attaching funds the moment it’s served, not after a hearing.

How must third parties respond to the order nisi?

A bank or employer served with an order nisi doesn’t get to sit back and watch.

The garnishee must file an affidavit to show cause, stating plainly whether it holds money or assets belonging to the debtor and whether that balance is enough to cover the debt.

Employers face a different version of the same obligation. Rather than freezing a lump sum, an employer served with a garnishee order must withhold a portion of the debtor’s salary and comply within 14 days of receiving the order, according to Mondaq’s breakdown of the process. One Federal High Court case involving a university registrar as garnishee shows this isn’t theoretical: employers do get pulled into enforcement proceedings over an employee’s personal debts.

If you’re on the garnishee side of this, the option that protects you is straightforward: respond honestly and on time. Disputing the debt is allowed. Ignoring the order is not an option that ends well.

The court grants an order absolute to mandate debt payment

The return date is where things either settle or escalate.

If the garnishee shows up and admits holding the debtor’s money without dispute, or if the garnishee simply fails to appear, the court converts the order nisi into an order absolute.

The legal backing for this comes from the enforcement provisions in the Sheriffs and Civil Process Act. Where a garnishee fails to pay the money into court, doesn’t dispute the debt, or doesn’t appear when summoned, the court can proceed to order execution once proof of service is confirmed, a mechanism detailed in ALP & Company’s paper on judgment debtor hearing rights.

The trade-off here cuts both ways. For the creditor, an order absolute is the finish line, actual payment rather than another piece of paper. For the garnishee, disputing the debt at the right stage is the only real defence against being forced to pay money it may not actually owe. Once the order turns absolute, arguing afterward becomes far harder than showing up and contesting it at the right hearing.

Distinguishing order nisi from order absolute

The two orders do different jobs, and confusing them is where most non-lawyers trip up. The order nisi freezes and questions. The order absolute pays. One is conditional and reversible; the other is a direct instruction to transfer money, and once granted, there’s very little room left to argue.

Certain legal defenses can discharge or set aside the order

Getting hit with an order nisi doesn’t mean the money is gone for good.

A judgment debtor can apply to have the order nisi discharged or set aside, but only on specific grounds. One accepted basis is a subsisting appeal against the underlying judgment combined with an active motion for stay of execution. This was argued at length in a National Industrial Court matter where counsel relied on Nigerian Breweries Plc v. Dumuje & Anor (2016) 8 NWLR (Pt. 1515) 536, cited in the court’s own ruling on the application to set aside, as authority for the conditions that must exist before such an application succeeds.

That same ruling raised other grounds worth knowing: disputes over the computation of the judgment sum, and whether the consent of the Attorney-General was obtained before garnishee proceedings were brought against certain classes of debtor, with failure to secure that consent argued as rendering the proceedings defective under the Sheriffs and Civil Process Act.

Here’s the contrast that changes how a debtor should think about this. Simply disagreeing with the judgment, or hoping the creditor loses interest, does nothing. What moves a court is a live procedural fact, an actual appeal on file, an actual stay application pending, or a genuine dispute over the arithmetic. Without one of those, an order nisi stands and typically becomes absolute on the return date.

Troubleshooting

The garnishee claims it holds none of the debtor’s funds. The affidavit to show cause is where this gets tested. If the creditor believes the denial is false, the matter proceeds to a hearing on that dispute rather than an automatic discharge.
The account frozen isn’t actually the debtor’s. A third party whose account gets caught up in error needs to intervene quickly with evidence of ownership, since the order nisi attaches funds based on the information in the ex parte application, which isn’t always accurate.
An employer ignores the 14-day compliance window. Delay doesn’t make the obligation disappear. It increases the risk that the court treats non-compliance the same way it treats a bank’s silence, as grounds for moving straight to an order absolute.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between a garnishee order nisi and an order absolute?

An order nisi is provisional. It freezes funds and tells the garnishee to explain itself in court. An order absolute is final.

Can a bank freeze an account without a garnishee order?

No, not under this process. A bank freezes funds because it has been served with a garnishee order nisi tied to a specific judgment debtor and a specific sum. If you believe an account was frozen in error, the first step is confirming whether an order nisi actually names that account.

How long does a garnishee order nisi stay valid?

This has been contested in Nigerian courts, including a National Industrial Court matter questioning whether an order nisi made in March 2024 had become stale and spent by the time it was still being relied on, as recorded in the court’s judgement record. There’s no fixed naira figure or universal timeline settled across all courts, which is exactly why debtors facing a long-delayed order should raise the staleness argument rather than assume the freeze has quietly expired.

Does a garnishee order work against an employer, not just a bank?

Yes. Where the third party is an employer rather than a bank, the order requires withholding part of the debtor’s salary rather than freezing a lump sum, and the employer must comply within 14 days of receiving the order, per Mondaq’s overview.

A garnishee order is one of the few enforcement tools in Nigerian civil practice that actually moves money, rather than producing another court date. Whether you’re trying to force payment from a debtor who’s run out of excuses, or trying to get your own frozen account released, the outcome depends on how precisely the application, the affidavit, or the defence is put together.

If you’re facing either side of a garnishee proceeding, get in touch with Ardnas Legal and let’s look at what the filings in your matter actually say.